The Composition Question

I recently posted on my Facebook page, asking people to let me know if there’s anything about photography that they still struggle with. A common complaint (well, the only one, but from two posters) was that people often don’t understand why their photographs don’t reflect the way they remember a scene.

I suspect that a simple grounding in composition techniques may help here. The human eye, in conjunction with the brain, is able to filter out extraneous detail, especially in a three-dimensional image constructed from the two images from each eye combined, whereas a photograph is not processed in the same way, so you need to be aware of how you can draw people into an image, keep their interest, and avoid distracting them with extraneous detail.

I’m listing here some techniques that I use in my photography to try to keep pictures interesting, and retain the impact of a scene as viewed through the naked eye.

Rule of Thirds

One of the most basic rules of composition is called the ‘Rule of Thirds’. This is a quick and easy way to make a photograph more pleasing, though it has variations and even detractors, which I’ll come to in a minute.

The basic principle is this: if you are photographing a subject that does not fill the frame, try placing the subject at any of the four points of intersection between imaginary lines which divide the picture into thirds both horizontally and vertically. This makes the image more pleasing to the eye. Here’s an example:

The Rule of Thirds in action
The Rule of Thirds in action

Opinion is divided over why the Rule of Thirds works, and there are even some who believe it is only an approximation of a different rule where objects should be placed on any of the four 45° diagonals drawn from each of the four corners of the image. This is known as the diagonal method.

The rule of thirds also applies to horizon lines. Try to place the horizon in your frame along one of the dividing lines that cut the frame into thirds, rather than exactly in the centre. This places clear emphasis on either the sky or the ground, avoiding the conflict created by bisecting the frame, when it’s not clear which is more important.

Leading lines

The photograph above also demonstrates the use of leading lines. Using a foreground detail, it is possible to lead the viewer’s eye into the photograph to a point of interest. This is often done using a straight or curved diagonal line starting at or near a corner of the image. The line of surf on the beach starts near the bottom left hand corner of the image and moves diagonally until it meets the rock stack, reinforcing its status as the subject of the image.

IMG_7582
The footpath leads directly to the tree, drawing the eye into the frame

By being aware of foreground elements, you can help to ensure the image does not inadvertently draw the eye away from the subject of interest, which causes conflict and makes an image less pleasing to look at.

Leading lines can also be implied. If you are photographing people or animals, the direction they are looking in will also lead the eye. Try to ensure they are looking into the frame, not outside it, which will naturally draw the viewer into the picture.

The puffins are looking left-to-right, so placing them at the left of the frame draws the viewer in. Note the puffins and the glacier in the background are also following the rule of thirds.
The puffins are looking left-to-right, so placing them at the left of the frame draws the viewer in.

Keep it simple

A common mistake in photography is to try to include too much of a scene in a single frame. This can disorientate the viewer and lead to a lack of engagement with the photograph. If you are photographing an object, try to avoid distractions by careful framing; ensure foreground objects don’t compete for attention, using leading lines to link them to the main subject or eliminating them altogether. Use an appropriate aperture and/or focal length to blur a distracting background (wider apertures and longer focal lengths will decrease depth of field).

Highgate cemetery is full of tombstones, trees and statues. Cropping in on one of the statues, and blurring out the background, keeps the composition simple.
Highgate cemetery is full of tombstones, trees and statues. Cropping in on one of the statues, and blurring out the background, keeps the composition simple.

Obviously there are instances where featuring a lot of information is the required effect. Where this is the case, think about using leading lines again to draw the eye from one group to another, and try to create a sense of unity by either showing the entire group of subjects in the scene, or cropping so that the group fills the scene to all four edges.

Find an unusual vantage point

A photograph is about more than just its subject. The location of the camera is implicit in every scene, and careful choice of vantage point can turn a good photo into a great one. Try to avoid shooting from eye level – this is how most people see objects every day, and adds nothing new to an interesting subject.

Squat on your haunches, or even place the camera on the ground, to increase foreground interest and emphasise the height of the subject. When doing this, look out for converging verticals – if you have to tilt the camera too far backwards, objects (particularly buildings) will look like they are leaning. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, just be aware of it and whether it adds to or detracts from the effect you are trying to achieve.

A low vantage point shows more of the interesting rocks in the foreground
A low vantage point shows more of the interesting rocks in the foreground

Many photogenic landmarks have typical views which everyone who visits feel they have to capture, like ticking off a list. To make your photos stand out, find a vantage point that shows your subject in a new light – try walking around it, viewing it from all angles, or see if there are buildings or staircases nearby that allow you to view it from higher up than ground level. Look for interesting juxtapositions with other objects in the area, and see if you can use two or more of the intersecting points from the Rule of Thirds.

A wind turbine, a common sight these days, becomes almost unrecognisably abstract when viewed from directly below.
A wind turbine, a common sight these days, becomes almost unrecognisably abstract when viewed from directly below.

Use context

Sometimes a scene can be rather abstract, so including familiar elements will provide context, particularly in terms of scale. An unfamiliar scene can confuse the viewer, so placing, for example, a human figure somewhere in the photograph serves two purposes: it orients the viewer so they know which way is ‘up’ (where it’s ambiguous), and also provides a sense of how large the subject is.

The photographer in the foroground emphasises just how high the waterfall is. Cropping out the top of the waterfall also serves to emphasis its scale.
The photographer in the foreground emphasises just how high the waterfall is. Cropping out the top of the waterfall also serves to emphasis its scale.

Balance opposing elements

If you are able to find elements of a scene that complement each other, try to make them balance, rather than compete. One of my favourite photos from Iceland is this one of a fjord in the Westfjords region, where most of the techniques I’ve described above have been used.

Ísafjorður fjord in Iceland
Ísafjörður fjord in Iceland

Note first of all that the horizon is not in the centre of the image, but more towards the top, approximately one-quarter of the way down the frame. A clear leading line follows the edge of the stones on the bank of the fjord, which has been enabled by a low vantage point. The composition is simple, with sharply defined dark and light areas (stones, water, mountain, sky) and the leading line of the bank continues into the outline of the mountain, creating a balance which makes the elements merge together into a whole.

Natural framing

Use of foreground to frame a subject can create a pleasing effect. A printed photograph always looks better in a frame, and you can create your own within the photograph itself using overhanging tree branches, windows or other holes, or walls. Always be aware of your surroundings so you can find something to frame your subject if it’s there.

The reeds in the foreground frame the photo and add depth
The reeds in the foreground frame the photo and add depth

Colour palette

One final tip I’ll pass on, though it’s not always feasible, is in a way an extension of the ‘keep it simple’ rule. Where possible, try to narrow the colour palette of your photograph as much as possible. Look for the predominant colour in your chosen subject, and try to match the foreground and background using similar colours (or neutral tones such as browns, blacks, greys and/or whites); or frame the image so that only one colour dominates.

Borough Market in London is a riot of colour, however ripe tomatoes are always red.
Borough Market in London is a riot of colour, however ripe tomatoes are always red.

If your subject itself is neutral in colour, try to keep the rest of the photograph based around one or two predominant colours.

This is more a stylistic tip than a rule, as obviously there are occasions where lots of strong, bright colours work well, but if you keep it in mind you may find you can add the extra element to a photograph that makes it stand out in your collection.

And finally…

Once you’ve got into the habit of applying these techniques to your photography, start to consciously make an effort to break them. Photography is, after all, an art form, and you are free to express yourself however you see fit. So be daring, and do something crazy now and then. You never know where your next great image may come from.

The natural symmetry of the church, broken only by the bell tower, makes it an ideal candidate for placing right in the centre of the image.
The natural symmetry of the church, broken only by the bell tower, makes it an ideal candidate for placing right in the centre of the image.

Glasgow School of Art

As I write, the news about the fire at the Glasgow School of Art is still a breaking story, it is unclear how extensive the damage is.

There is no doubt in my mind that the Scottish genius Charles Rennie Mackintosh is one of the many reasons I am interested in architecture. When I first saw photos of one of his extraordinary high-backed chairs, on a poster for an exhibition at London’s Victoria and Albert museum years ago, my interest was piqued. In 1999, I went on a tour of Scotland with my family and we visited the Hill House in Helensburgh, the Willow Tea Rooms in Sauciehall Street but were sadly unable to visit the Glasgow School of Art as it had closed, minutes prior to our arrival.

I was already familiar with a lot of his work having bought a copy of the wonderful book, The Mackintosh Style by Elizabeth Wilhide, which among other things explains how Mackintosh understood how closely linked the disciplines of architecture and interior design are, reflected in the unique and strikingly beautiful chairs, beds, clocks, light fittings and countless other features found in his buildings; but to be able to see the results of his astonishing imagination at first hand was an experience I’ll never forget.

Which makes it all the more upsetting to hear the news today about the fire that has broken out in the School of Art. I only wish I’d made the effort to visit the building again after our disappointment all those years ago, and I can only hope that enough of the building remains to enable it to be restored to its former glory.

Mackintosh died aged 60, just as his work was beginning to take new and more interesting directions (as seen at 78 Derngate in Northamptonshire) so we will never know what more he could have been capable of producing. At less than 100 years old, the world should mourn what could be the premature loss of the Glasgow School of Art.

Frank Day

Last Thursday I was asked to help take photos of a number of publicity stunts to promote the new film Frank, which is out this Friday (9th May). My client, the company who came up with the ideas, have provided some interesting work in the past, so I was looking forward to an enjoyable day; I wasn’t disappointed. Here are some of the planned and—even better—unplanned moments that happened that day…

Underground invasion
Underground invasion
At the cinema.
At the cinema.
Crossing the road at Abbey Road, trying to annoy as few drivers as possible...
Crossing the road at Abbey Road, trying to annoy as few drivers as possible…
Catching up on the latest news
Catching up on the latest news
Frank has a haircut
Frank has a haircut
Frank meets a new friend in the barber shop
Frank meets a new friend in the barber shop
Fame has its advantages…
Fame has its advantages…
Unscheduled hula-hooping at Carnaby Street
More unscheduled hula hooping
More unscheduled hula hooping
A busy day over. Time for the pub.
A busy day over. Time for the pub.

Hillsborough, 25 years on

"You'll Never Walk Alone", Shankly Gates, Anfield, Liverpool
“You’ll Never Walk Alone”, Shankly Gates, Anfield, Liverpool – photo by Andy Nugent, on Flickr

Writing about Hillsborough is difficult for me, but not for the reasons you might think.

I wasn’t there on 15th April 1989, I was in the car with my Mum in Norwich, returning home after a day’s shopping with the radio on when I heard what had happened. At the time I don’t think I had realised exactly how bad things were – I was only 16.

There are so many people who were directly affected by the tragedy – not only the families of the 96 men, women and children who died, but also the survivors who were there and witnessed the horrific events unfolding, who tried or were unable to help, and who subsequently saw their names dragged through the mud in the following days by a certain newspaper (still, shamefully, the best selling newspaper in this country). With their experiences, who am I to comment on something that did not affect me personally? Yet I still get upset reading about that awful day, and I’m only beginning to understand why.

There was certainly a perception of football fans at the time as no more than sub-human hooligans. And it’s true that travelling as an away supporter, to Liverpool or elsewhere, was an unpleasant experience for many – I’ve heard stories of people waiting at Lime Street station for fans in away team colours in order to deliberately target them for abuse or physical attacks. The image of scousers in general was also a negative one – growing up in Wigan, if we heard Liverpool accents we walked the other way, the prejudices of a generation being handed down to us children without being questioned. The actions of a minority who were responsible for the tragic events at the Heysel stadium in 1985 were also conflated to the extent that all English clubs were banned from European competition for years.

Of course all groups are stereotyped, and usually on the basis of the actions of a small but disproportionately vocal or visible minority. Liverpool, a city with high unemployment and two major football clubs, was an obvious target, and the way a major national newspaper even thought it could get away with its scandalous ‘The Truth’ front page was an indicator of just how mainstream, almost accepted, that stereotyping was.

JFT96
JFT96 by Graham Walton, on Flickr

I now know, of course, having travelled to Liverpool myself as a supporter, and having met many people older than I who have been travelling to Anfield since they were children, that this stereotype just does not apply to the vast majority of fans. Even outside the football grounds, the people of Liverpool are ridiculously friendly, not suspicious of someone with a camera and tripod like in London, always chatting to strangers like they’ve known them all their life, much like most towns and cities in the North of England. And knowing that 96 of these wonderful people, whose only wish was to see their team play an FA Cup semifinal, were seen as somehow unworthy of the respect usually reserved for the dead, is still only part of why I feel so upset when I read about what happened on that day and afterwards.

No, the one thing that transforms a person’s capacity for empathy is becoming a parent. My son is now 15, the same age as many of those who were at Hillsborough. The thought of him being taken away so indiscriminately, by something that people had been warning could happen for years, and yet still was not prevented, is heart-wrenching. I can’t possibly imagine what it’s been like for the families of the 96 who have had to wait 25 years to find out why their loved ones were let down so shamefully. I can only hope that they finally get what they have been so desperately searching for all this time.

  • John Alfred Anderson (62)
  • Colin Mark Ashcroft (19)
  • James Gary Aspinall (18)
  • Kester Roger Marcus Ball (16)
  • Gerard Bernard Patrick Baron (67)
  • Simon Bell (17)
  • Barry Sidney Bennett (26)
  • David John Benson (22)
  • David William Birtle (22)
  • Tony Bland (22)
  • Paul David Brady (21)
  • Andrew Mark Brookes (26)
  • Carl Brown (18)
  • David Steven Brown (25)
  • Henry Thomas Burke (47)
  • Peter Andrew Burkett (24)
  • Paul William Carlile (19)
  • Raymond Thomas Chapman (50)
  • Gary Christopher Church (19)
  • Joseph Clark (29)
  • Paul Clark (18)
  • Gary Collins (22)
  • Stephen Paul Copoc (20)
  • Tracey Elizabeth Cox (23)
  • James Philip Delaney (19)
  • Christopher Barry Devonside (18)
  • Christopher Edwards (29)
  • Vincent Michael Fitzsimmons (34)
  • Thomas Steven Fox (21)
  • Jon-Paul Gilhooley (10)
  • Barry Glover (27)
  • Ian Thomas Glover (20)
  • Derrick George Godwin (24)
  • Roy Harry Hamilton (34)
  • Philip Hammond (14)
  • Eric Hankin (33)
  • Gary Harrison (27)
  • Stephen Francis Harrison (31)
  • Peter Andrew Harrison (15)
  • David Hawley (39)
  • James Robert Hennessy (29)
  • Paul Anthony Hewitson (26)
  • Carl Darren Hewitt (17)
  • Nicholas Michael Hewitt (16)
  • Sarah Louise Hicks (19)
  • Victoria Jane Hicks (15)
  • Gordon Rodney Horn (20)
  • Arthur Horrocks (41)
  • Thomas Howard (39)
  • Thomas Anthony Howard (14)
  • Eric George Hughes (42)
  • Alan Johnston (29)
  • Christine Anne Jones (27)
  • Gary Philip Jones (18)
  • Richard Jones (25)
  • Nicholas Peter Joynes (27)
  • Anthony Peter Kelly (29)
  • Michael David Kelly (38)
  • Carl David Lewis (18)
  • David William Mather (19)
  • Brian Christopher Mathews (38)
  • Francis Joseph McAllister (27)
  • John McBrien (18)
  • Marian Hazel McCabe (21)
  • Joseph Daniel McCarthy (21)
  • Peter McDonnell (21)
  • Alan McGlone (28)
  • Keith McGrath (17)
  • Paul Brian Murray (14)
  • Lee Nicol (14)
  • Stephen Francis O’Neill (17)
  • Jonathon Owens (18)
  • William Roy Pemberton (23)
  • Carl William Rimmer (21)
  • David George Rimmer (38)
  • Graham John Roberts (24)
  • Steven Joseph Robinson (17)
  • Henry Charles Rogers (17)
  • Colin Andrew Hugh William Sefton (23)
  • Inger Shah (38)
  • Paula Ann Smith (26)
  • Adam Edward Spearritt (14)
  • Philip John Steele (15)
  • David Leonard Thomas (23)
  • Patrick John Thompson (35)
  • Peter Reuben Thompson (30)
  • Stuart Paul William Thompson (17)
  • Peter Francis Tootle (21)
  • Christopher James Traynor (26)
  • Martin Kevin Traynor (16)
  • Kevin Tyrrell (15)
  • Colin Wafer (19)
  • Ian David Whelan (19)
  • Martin Kenneth Wild (29)
  • Kevin Daniel Williams (15)
  • Graham John Wright (17)

Rest in Peace

More Icelanders

Icelanders in London - Bjarni, Guðný, Charlotte and Nanna
Icelanders in London – Bjarni, Guðný, Charlotte and Nanna

I had another shoot with some Icelandic people based in London for my Icelanders in London project on Saturday – you can see the stories of Rannveig and Clara, as well as all the other Icelanders who have been involved so far, over at the project website.

If you’re reading this, and you are Icelandic and live in London, please get in touch if you’d like to be involved.