Case study: Luxury furniture showroom

This London based furniture showroom sells a range of high end Italian designed furniture. While I was at the shoot, a couple had flown over from Bermuda and were discussing their requirements with one of the staff. Many of the units on display here fetch four or even five-figure prices, so not the sort of thing you’d find in the January furniture sales as advertised on the TV after Christmas!

The London store is a franchise, operating under the name of the furniture manufacturer but being run as a separate company. They had shown me the catalogue produced by the Italian franchisor to give an indication of the sort of images they wanted. I composed the images to capture narrow colour palettes and desaturated the images very slightly to match the mood of the images from the catalogue I had been shown.

With hotel interiors, the emphasis is generally on the space, with the size of the space an important consideration, so wider lenses (around 16mm) are usually preferred. However when shooting furniture, you’re concentrating more on elements, so I stuck with a 24mm lens for most of the shots, shifting the lens slightly where needed.

IMG_4464

IMG_4429

IMG_4555

IMG_4505At times the angles needed meant shifting the lens horizontally to ensure the strict horizontal and vertical lines were retained, even when not aligned with the centre of the object:

IMG_4503I always take longer lenses with me to interior shoots as the detail shots can be as effective as the wider images:

IMG_5450

IMG_5448Of course for the shots of the whole showroom, it was necessary to go a bit wider, and from the elevated perspective I had to take full advantage of the shift capability of my 17mm lens:

IMG_4552As you can see from the plum-coloured pedestal, when shifted this much, the distortion can be quite extreme, so you need to be very careful using these lenses with elements that are visible at the extreme edges of the frame.

 

Two copies is not enough

diskdrive
Image © Norlando Pobre; licensed under Creative Commons

A friend of mine, who shall remain anonymous, today lost nearly 1TB of data after a disk drive failed. The disk was mirrored, so it may still be recoverable, and indeed they have recovered about 750GB from the damaged disk, but they don’t need me to tell them that a robust backup setup would have saved them the cost of that recovery software, and the stress of potential loss of data.

A disk can fail at any time, for no reason, and with no warning. This fact should be at the back of your mind every time you consider your data storage setup. If it worries you, it should, but a good backup regime will help to minimise that worry.

At no point in time should you ever have only one copy of a file. This is the foundation of a good backup schedule. When you are taking photos, if you have a camera that supports multiple cards, ensure you have the photos written to both cards simultaneously. The next best thing is to ensure you import the images to your computer as soon as possible and as regularly as possible. If you have enough cards, don’t delete the images from the cards until they are fully incorporated into your backup system. If your hard drive fails, and you’ve formatted your card, the images are lost.

So, let’s say you use have a regular backup of your files, such as Apple’s Time Machine or an equivalent. Are you safe? If your computer’s hard drive fails, then you are left with just one copy of your files (on your backup disk) which is exposed and vulnerable to drive failure until you are able to replace and restore the drive. If anything happened to your backup disk during this time,  your data is lost again. Ideally, your important data should be stored initially on a RAID mirrored drive, where two disks contain identical data so that even if one fails, the other is still functional, and you still have a second copy on your hourly backup.

OK, so what happens if your house burns down? All three copies of your data could still vanish without trace. But there is still more that you can do. Services such as Backblaze act as a third line of defence against data loss. For a fixed monthly or annual fee, Backblaze will back up all your data (except for items that can be more easily recovered, e.g. applications for which you still have the installer disks or which you can re-download from the publisher) every hour. There is no limit to the amount of data you can store (I currently have 1.6 TB of data backed up to Backblaze) and being offsite means that you can recover all of your data even if your house or office is physically damaged. It may take several months for your first initial backup, depending on your internet connection speed, but once that first backup is complete your data is even safer.

If reading this doesn’t make you want to review your backup regime immediately, you’re either already sorted, or beyond help! Just ask yourself what you would do if all the data on your disk vanished in the next minute.

The Image Story

Interestingly enough, not long after I started my brief series of posts on ‘The Story behind the Photo’ here on my blog, a site appeared called The Image Story that does the same thing for a whole range of photographers (disclosure: one of whom is your correspondent).

Screen Shot 2014-02-08 at 20.39.03

Started by Todd Owyoung, the New York based music and portrait photographer, The Image Story lets the photographers tell the whole story behind the images, including the preparation, execution, post-processing, and any other related information. It includes a great picture by a friend of mine, Valerio Berdini, alongside a wide range of image styles and genres, and promises to be a great source of inspiration to photographers of all levels as it grows its collection and its audience.

Photography is dead. No it isn’t. Is it?

 

A member of the audience records a performance of Retro StefsonPhotography is dead. Photography has never been more alive.

Photography is losing its soul. Photography has been democratised.

Photography is dumbing down. Photography has never been more sophisticated.

In the end, a photograph is a photograph. Does it elicit an emotional response? Does it take you back to those lazy days on the beach last summer? Does it make you remember how proud you were when your son or daughter first wore a school uniform? Does it make you laugh again at how crazy that night out was? Does it start an entertaining discussion on the best way to make a chilli? Does it fill you with wonder and awe at the power of nature? Does it help you sell your product to the right kind of client? Does it tell a story about a war and its effect on a society that has lived with conflict for decades? Does it present you in a professional manner? Does it show how a moment of happiness can be found in the most miserable places? Does it show a performer at the peak of their career, lost in their art? Does it show dignity in the face of declining health and advancing years? Does it make you hungry or thirsty? Does it show two athletes giving everything they can and then a little bit more? Does it tease and titillate? Does it make you think?

Doesn’t it make you think? What is ‘true’ photography if not all of these things and more?

The story behind the photo: King of the water

Perching kingfisher, Alcedo atthis (click the image to view larger)
Perching kingfisher, Alcedo atthis (click the image to view larger)

Kingfishers are a popular subject among photographers, and it’s not hard to see why. Their vibrant colours look amazing, and they are so fast and skittish that capturing one on camera comes with a real sense of achievement. It was years before I saw my first kingfisher, at Sparham Pools in Norfolk, but that was through the lenses of a pair of binoculars. I’d been determined ever since to get a ‘proper’ kingfisher photo, and realised it would take patience and planning, and a not insignificant slice of luck.

Where we live in Hertfordshire there is a small stream very close to our house. It’s not very fast, and often dries up in dry spells, but during the spring there is a steady stream of shallow, clear water running beneath overhanging trees on one side, with a vertical bank of soil on the other, making it the perfect habitat for these elegant birds. I remember one day seeing a flash of blue-green as I approached our car (which parks on a spot that overlooks the stream) and realised that we had kingfishers for neighbours! By now aware of their presence I made a point of looking each time I went out to the car, and more often than not, I’d see one perched on a branch overlooking the stream, who would fly away as soon as I got close.

It didn’t take long to get to know their habits, so one day I decided to use what I knew to get a shot of one of them. I set the camera up on a tripod which sat in the shallow stream, pointing at the branch I had spotted the bird on, and focused manually. I then sat in the car which overlooked the branch, and waited. I didn’t have to wait long – about 5 minutes later, this male bird came and perched on the branch, completely oblivious to my camera, and had a good long look around. With the remote shutter release I took a sequence of photos, and among them was this lovely side-on view with his eye and beak in pin-sharp focus.

Over the next few days we saw this one and the female (identified by the orange colouring on her lower beak) regularly, and came to the conclusion that there must be a nest nearby – the soil bank, it turned out, was perfect for the burrow nest they like to make, so I decided not to bother them any more.