Archive for the ‘Musings’ Category

The Long Line

Tuesday, April 27th, 2010

The long line is here.

Just an experiment.

Beware of the Comp

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Have you ever entered a photo com­pet­i­tion? When sub­mit­ting a photo for one, have you ever wondered what’s in it for the pro­moter? You might be sur­prised at how most photo com­pet­i­tions are just a way for pub­lish­ers to obtain cheap or even free stock pho­to­graphy without most people real­ising how their pho­to­graphs will be used. Here are some samples from terms and con­di­tions of photo com­pet­i­tions I’ve seen recently:

By enter­ing the com­pet­i­tion all entrants grant to the BBC the right to pub­lish and exhibit their pho­to­graphs on tele­vi­sion and on the BBC’s web­site. Entrants whose pho­to­graphs are one of the Final­ists … grant to the BBC (includ­ing BBC World­wide and other pub­lish­ers author­ised by the BBC) the fur­ther rights to pub­lish and exhibit their pho­to­graphs in print, on their respect­ive web­sites or in any other media. No fees will be pay­able for any of the above uses.“
BBC Coun­try­file Cal­en­dar com­pet­i­tion 2009

Copy­right in all images sub­mit­ted for this com­pet­i­tion remains with the respect­ive entrants. How­ever, in con­sid­er­a­tion of their provid­ing the Com­pet­i­tion, each entrant grants a world­wide, irre­voc­able, per­petual licence to Tele­graph Media Group Lim­ited to fea­ture any or all of the sub­mit­ted images in any of their pub­lic­a­tions, their web­sites and/​or in any pro­mo­tional mater­ial con­nec­ted to this com­pet­i­tion. “
Pho­tos on Sunday, the monthly pho­to­graphy com­pet­i­tion from The Sunday Tele­graph, May 2009

Entrants will retain copy­right in their sub­mit­ted entries, how­ever, by enter­ing, all entrants licence TNL a world­wide royalty-​​free per­petual licence to edit, pub­lish and use each entry in any and all media (includ­ing print and online) for pub­li­city and news pur­poses. This use includes any use in event exhib­i­tions where TNL exhib­its Cit­izen Trav­el­ler for pro­mo­tional activ­ity. “
Times Travel Photo Com­pet­i­tion, Janu­ary 2010

Notice a theme? By dangling prizes in front of entrants, these estab­lished and respec­ted news organ­isa­tions are basic­ally hoover­ing up an almost end­less sup­ply of stock pho­to­graphy, in most cases without the pho­to­graph­ers even know­ing. As the prizes are often provided by a spon­sor, the pro­moters can be pay­ing next to noth­ing for the privilege.

If you are ser­i­ous about want­ing to make money from your pho­to­graphy, you may think that com­pet­i­tions such as these are a good place to start, as the win­ner will of course receive free pub­li­city. How­ever I would strongly cau­tion against this approach; if a photo is good enough to win such a com­pet­i­tion then it’s good enough to be sold through a stock lib­rary agency, who will charge (and hence pay you) far more than the value of some of these prizes for a per­petual, royalty-​​free licence to use that image.

There’s noth­ing wrong with want­ing to get your images out there and seen, but that is of course what sites like flickr are for — it costs you next to noth­ing, your rights as the con­tent author are pre­served (des­pite occa­sional breaches which usu­ally get much pub­li­city and hence are resolved rel­at­ively quickly) and you have a world­wide audi­ence. Unless the T&Cs are clear and expli­cit about not recyc­ling your pho­to­graphs, leave the com­pet­i­tions to the cas­ual snap­pers who are in it just for the thrill of get­ting their pic­tures in print, and let your pho­to­graphs earn the rev­enue they deserve.

UPDATE: It’s just been poin­ted out to me on Twit­ter that some pho­to­graphy courses are guilty of sim­ilar beha­viour. Have a look at the T&Cs for the Shoot Exper­i­ence photo work­shops:

When you enter a Shoot Exper­i­ence Com­pet­i­tion or Event, you agree to … grant to Shoot Exper­i­ence and its part­ners (for that Event/​Competition) the non-​​exclusive, irre­voc­able, world­wide right and licence to use your Entry solely and exclus­ively for pub­li­city and mar­ket­ing pur­poses and in all media in rela­tion to mar­ket­ing future Com­pet­i­tions and/​or Events for a 5 year period.

Thanks to Gareth Bourne for the update.

Happy New Year!

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

2009 hasn’t been the best of years for a lot of people that I know, and many that I don’t. I hope 2010 will be much bet­ter for them, and for all of you, dear read­ers and view­ers. Please feel free to help your­self to some desktop wall­pa­per, avail­able in the fol­low­ing sizes:

1680 x 1050
1440 x 900
1280 x 1024
1024 x 768

Why Flickr still makes me uncomfortable

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

The Guard­ian has a report of the BBC using a pho­to­graph they found on flickr for com­mer­cial pur­poses, in con­tra­ven­tion of the Cre­at­ive Com­mons terms under which it was pub­lished. Given that it was only pure conin­cid­ence that the pho­to­grapher noticed this par­tic­u­lar breach, it makes you won­der how often this sort of thing hap­pens. Flickr is all well and good as a ready-​​made gal­lery site, but if you use it to store full res­ol­u­tion cop­ies of your pho­to­graphs, then no mat­ter how restrict­ive a licence you apply to them, it would be very dif­fi­cult to pre­vent unscru­pu­lous or, to give the BBC the bene­fit of the doubt, care­less use of the pho­to­graphs for pur­poses spe­cific­ally excluded by the CC or copy­right terms, unless you make sure that you only allow friends and/​or fam­ily to down­load the originals.