<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aperture 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickminers.com/2010/02/aperture-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickminers.com/2010/02/aperture-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:37:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFG Photography » Blog Archive » Lightroom</title>
		<link>http://nickminers.com/2010/02/aperture-3/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>SFG Photography » Blog Archive » Lightroom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickminers.com/?p=953#comment-164</guid>
		<description>[...] 3 was just recently released by Apple (a good overview of it against Lightroom can be found over at nickminers.com) and this has narrowed the gap quite considerably between it and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] 3 was just recently released by Apple (a good overview of it against Lightroom can be found over at nickminers.com) and this has narrowed the gap quite considerably between it and […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://nickminers.com/2010/02/aperture-3/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickminers.com/?p=953#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul - technically I guess you&#039;re correct, but unless you&#039;ve seen the grad tool in Lightroom I guess you&#039;ll not know how inadequate that suggestion is! When you place the graduated effect in LR, you can change the strength of the gradient and the angle afterwards; not something you&#039;ll be able to do quickly and easily with a brush!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul — technically I guess you’re correct, but unless you’ve seen the grad tool in Lightroom I guess you’ll not know how inadequate that suggestion is! When you place the graduated effect in LR, you can change the strength of the gradient and the angle afterwards; not something you’ll be able to do quickly and easily with a brush!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://nickminers.com/2010/02/aperture-3/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickminers.com/?p=953#comment-149</guid>
		<description>I’ve got the download trial too. Those who know me will be please to know that is does support the Leica D-Lux 4. For me, this is a big deal. It (and its Panasonic brethren) have not been supported by Apple until now, which means that RAW files have been unusable in Aperture (and indeed any software which uses Apple’s RAW APIs). I am really happy to see that Aperture 3 has addressed this. Up until yesterday, I was considering a jump to Lightroom. Obviously, the Aperture upgrade price is far, far better than a Lightroom purchase.

As for the Graduated Filters, I can’t find them either, but you CAN brush adjustments using a brush with a lot of feathering, which may do the job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve got the download trial too. Those who know me will be please to know that is does support the Leica D-Lux 4. For me, this is a big deal. It (and its Panasonic brethren) have not been supported by Apple until now, which means that RAW files have been unusable in Aperture (and indeed any software which uses Apple’s RAW APIs). I am really happy to see that Aperture 3 has addressed this. Up until yesterday, I was considering a jump to Lightroom. Obviously, the Aperture upgrade price is far, far better than a Lightroom purchase.</p>
<p>As for the Graduated Filters, I can’t find them either, but you CAN brush adjustments using a brush with a lot of feathering, which may do the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://nickminers.com/2010/02/aperture-3/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickminers.com/?p=953#comment-148</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m already into the Aperture world, so I can only comment from that side of the fence. I won&#039;t be jumping just yet, preferring to wait for the first x.0.1 round of bug fixes that inevitably follow a release. 

I also want to see what other Aperture users find, and whether there is any benefit to also upgrading my OS to get the 64-bit goodness. (Can my MBP even do 64-bit. Hmm, don&#039;t think it can. Bum.)

It is a little disappointing the graduated filters isn&#039;t in Aperture, this is true. It&#039;s a feature I&#039;ve heard and read a lot about in Lightroom, and I was sort of hoping it might make an appearance. Still, it might appear in a future update. Loads of new features crept in during Aperture 2&#039;s lifecycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m already into the Aperture world, so I can only comment from that side of the fence. I won’t be jumping just yet, preferring to wait for the first x.0.1 round of bug fixes that inevitably follow a release. </p>
<p>I also want to see what other Aperture users find, and whether there is any benefit to also upgrading my OS to get the 64-bit goodness. (Can my MBP even do 64-bit. Hmm, don’t think it can. Bum.)</p>
<p>It is a little disappointing the graduated filters isn’t in Aperture, this is true. It’s a feature I’ve heard and read a lot about in Lightroom, and I was sort of hoping it might make an appearance. Still, it might appear in a future update. Loads of new features crept in during Aperture 2’s lifecycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://nickminers.com/2010/02/aperture-3/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickminers.com/?p=953#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Good point. This also appears to be missing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. This also appears to be missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://nickminers.com/2010/02/aperture-3/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickminers.com/?p=953#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Is there no graduated filter available in Aperture? I had a quick glance through the Aperture new features page on the Apple &#039;site but couldn&#039;t see anything approaching this function in Lr2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there no graduated filter available in Aperture? I had a quick glance through the Aperture new features page on the Apple ‘site but couldn’t see anything approaching this function in Lr2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://nickminers.com/2010/02/aperture-3/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickminers.com/?p=953#comment-145</guid>
		<description>I work fast, man. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work fast, man. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://nickminers.com/2010/02/aperture-3/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickminers.com/?p=953#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Holy cow that was quick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy cow that was quick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
