Aperture 3

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Apple today announced the release of ver­sion three of their pro photo edit­ing and cata­loguing tool, Aper­ture. As ever there is an option to try the product for 30 days, so I availed myself of the offer and had a quick play with it. Of course there is only so much you can work out from an hour or so using some­thing as richly fea­tured as Aper­ture, how­ever it was enough to give me a feel for the soft­ware and to com­pare it at a very high level with Pho­toshop Light­room 2, my cur­rent work­flow soft­ware of choice.

As you’d expect from Apple, the user inter­face has some very nice touches and it didn’t take me long to find my way around the soft­ware. Of the head­lining new fea­tures, I don’t really expect to have much use for the Faces tool, as I don’t take fam­ily snap­shots, nor for Places as there is no GPS device attached to my SLR. How­ever Brushes is a local adjust­ment tool that matches Lightroom’s adjust­ment brushes pretty much feature-​​for-​​feature. The vari­ous pre­sets for Brushes include ‘skin-​​smoothing’ (not avail­able in Light­room), which will be very use­ful for people who make a liv­ing from por­trait pho­to­graphy, though I sus­pect more advanced users would use their own set­tings rather than trust it to the soft­ware. Dis­ap­point­ingly there is still no option to tint the high­lights and shad­ows in a mono­chrome image, which is not the biggest let-​​down in the grand scheme of things, but it is a fea­ture I use in Light­room a lot for my black-​​and-​​white work.

I also have a beta ver­sion of Light­room 3 which I haven’t really used much. If I get the oppor­tun­ity I’ll spend some time work­ing with both Aper­ture 3 and Light­room 3 beta over the next few weeks to see if I can make some more detailed obser­va­tions on the vari­ous fea­tures avail­able, and may even be able to decide whether my next step will be to upgrade to LR3 when it is released offi­cially, or whether Apple have done enough to help me to switch.

Update: promp­ted by the com­ments from Mark below, I went back to see if there was a gradu­ated fil­ter tool in Aper­ture 3. I couldn’t find it.

Tags: , , , ,

8 Responses to “Aperture 3”

  1. Mark Says:

    Holy cow that was quick.

  2. Nick Says:

    I work fast, man. :D

  3. Mark Says:

    Is there no gradu­ated fil­ter avail­able in Aper­ture? I had a quick glance through the Aper­ture new fea­tures page on the Apple ‘site but couldn’t see any­thing approach­ing this func­tion in Lr2.

  4. Nick Says:

    Good point. This also appears to be missing.

  5. Heather Says:

    I’m already into the Aper­ture world, so I can only com­ment from that side of the fence. I won’t be jump­ing just yet, pre­fer­ring to wait for the first x.0.1 round of bug fixes that inev­it­ably fol­low a release.

    I also want to see what other Aper­ture users find, and whether there is any bene­fit to also upgrad­ing my OS to get the 64-​​bit good­ness. (Can my MBP even do 64-​​bit. Hmm, don’t think it can. Bum.)

    It is a little dis­ap­point­ing the gradu­ated fil­ters isn’t in Aper­ture, this is true. It’s a fea­ture I’ve heard and read a lot about in Light­room, and I was sort of hop­ing it might make an appear­ance. Still, it might appear in a future update. Loads of new fea­tures crept in dur­ing Aper­ture 2’s lifecycle.

  6. Paul Says:

    I’ve got the down­load trial too. Those who know me will be please to know that is does sup­port the Leica D-​​Lux 4. For me, this is a big deal. It (and its Panasonic brethren) have not been sup­por­ted by Apple until now, which means that RAW files have been unus­able in Aper­ture (and indeed any soft­ware which uses Apple’s RAW APIs). I am really happy to see that Aper­ture 3 has addressed this. Up until yes­ter­day, I was con­sid­er­ing a jump to Light­room. Obvi­ously, the Aper­ture upgrade price is far, far bet­ter than a Light­room purchase.

    As for the Gradu­ated Fil­ters, I can’t find them either, but you CAN brush adjust­ments using a brush with a lot of feath­er­ing, which may do the job.

  7. Nick Says:

    Hi Paul — tech­nic­ally I guess you’re cor­rect, but unless you’ve seen the grad tool in Light­room I guess you’ll not know how inad­equate that sug­ges­tion is! When you place the gradu­ated effect in LR, you can change the strength of the gradi­ent and the angle after­wards; not some­thing you’ll be able to do quickly and eas­ily with a brush!

  8. SFG Photography » Blog Archive » Lightroom Says:

    […] 3 was just recently released by Apple (a good over­view of it against Light­room can be found over at nick​miners​.com) and this has nar­rowed the gap quite con­sid­er­ably between it and […]

Leave a Reply